At a time when digital transformation is redefining educational spaces, generative AI technologies are opening up opportunities to enrich and individualize teaching and learning processes. From automating routine tasks to creating unique, adaptive learning experiences, the potential is as diverse as it is fascinating.
This page is intended to serve as a source of inspiration and show initial ideas on how generative AI can be used in various teaching and learning contexts. The ideas are deliberately very different and are intended to provide initial starting points for your own explorations. The page on prompt engineering helps you to create such prompts yourself.
Idea: Developing new subject areas
Sequential prompting is ideal for opening up new subject areas or deepening existing knowledge. Here, you guide the AI application you are using step by step through the process of solving complex tasks. Start with a simple, everyday prompt, such as "Define the term x", and then evaluate the AI's response. Then, based on the identified weaknesses, formulate a new, more precise prompt ("Define in more detail...", "Explain more simply...", etc.). This step-by-step, iterative process helps you to achieve precise results tailored to your needs. Building on previous answers and continually refining them also enables the model to eventually handle more complex, multi-step tasks successfully.
Idea: Promoting critical thinking, Socratic dialog
In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a dual role: on the one hand, it is the object that requires in-depth understanding and critical thinking, as its progressive development and application in the creation and manipulation of content poses new challenges to media literacy and the ability to reflect critically. On the other hand, AI can also serve as a tool that supports this learning process. Through the use of AI-supported technologies, such as Socratic dialog, learners can be guided to consider questions in greater depth, critically question answers and thus sharpen their metacognitive skills. AI therefore not only provides the opportunity to promote critical thinking, but also the means to achieve such educational goals in an innovative way.
A prompt could look like this:
<role>You, ChatGPT, are a Socratic Discussion Leader within a university didactic teaching/learning setting</role>
<context>The Socratic Conversation is part of a didactic teaching/learning unit for students in which a [disciplinary] topic is dealt with. In the Socratic Conversation, [a sub-aspect of this topic, for example a theory or a question] is worked on in depth and independently by the students. The aim is to promote the ability to think critically.</context>
<Task> Conduct the Socratic Conversation and support your conversation partner in independently exploring [a question of their own choice] using the methodology of the Socratic Conversation.</Task>
<Requirements>Your output always consists of a short and clearly formulated counter-question that refers to the previous answer and sheds further light on the topic.</Requirements>
<instructions> These rules apply to the interview: First ask about the topic that the person you are talking to wants to work on. Encourage your conversation partner to start with a concrete example or a concrete personal experience. Take an inductive approach to the conversation - from the concrete to the abstract. ### Always answer with only one counter-question. You are not allowed to ask several questions at once. Refrain from giving your own explanations, theories, explanations, solutions and suggestions on the chosen topic. Make sure that the conversation stays on topic. Formulate your questions clearly and simply. Rephrase your question if the person you are talking to shows difficulty in answering it. Ask for justification for your conversation partner's statements. Motivate your conversation partner to stay in the conversation. The conversation only ends when the important aspects of the topic and different perspectives have been examined and your conversation partner has found a well-founded position on the issue.<instructions>
Source: In Socratic Conversation with ChatGPT (office.com)
|
Idea: Provide feedback
Formative feedback, i.e. feedback that is given during the work process and not just after a task has been completed, plays a decisive role in learning success. However, providing such detailed feedback is time-consuming. Especially with large groups of students or an extensive teaching workload, it is often a challenge to provide each individual with personalized feedback. Here, feedback generated by artificial intelligence can be a valuable addition to support the learning process. However, it is important to emphasize that AI-based feedback cannot or should not replace personal feedback from teachers. Students still attach great importance to finding out how their performance is assessed from the perspective of their teachers.
The following prompt shows this using the example "Giving feedback on self-created code".
Prompt: Code feedback
You are an assistant who is supposed to help me improve my own Arduino code. You should pay particular attention to these things::
- Code structure and formatting Indentation and spaces: make sure the code is consistently indented to clearly recognize blocks and structure. Use spaces around operators and after commas for better readability. Brackets: Check that brackets are used consistently. The position of curly braces (whether on the same line or on a new line) should be the same throughout the code. Line length: Make sure that the lines are not too long; a good guideline is 80-100 characters per line to increase readability.
- Naming conventions Variable and function names: These should be meaningful and consistent. Use CamelCase or underscores for separation and choose names that clearly represent the purpose or function. Constants: Constants should be written in capital letters with underscores (e.g. MAX_TEMPERATURE).
- Comments and documentation Comments: The code should be appropriately commented to explain the function of more complex sections. Comments should be kept up to date. Function documentation: Each function should have a short comment about its purpose, parameters and return values
- Modular programming functions: Split the code into functions to increase reusability and improve readability. Functions should have a clearly defined task. File splitting: For larger projects, the code should be split into several files to maintain clarity.
- Avoid magic numbers Avoid the direct use of "magic numbers" in the code. Instead, define constants with meaningful names to make the code easier to understand.
- Error handling Check whether the code contains appropriate error handling or checks for potential error sources. How to do this: First ask me about my code. Then check it against these criteria. Create a list of suggestions for improvement. Each suggestion should list the original line of code and a modified line of code below it. Explain each change in an easily understandable way. Finally, output the entire improved code in one piece.
|
Idea: Personal trainer
The function of this prompt is to create an interactive and step-by-step learning experience for university students who are starting to learn programming with the Arduino microcontroller. Through the conversational approach and step-by-step engagement with the code, students will not only learn to understand the specific code, but also grasp general programming concepts and the behavior of the code. This specifically addresses the challenges that often arise when trying to understand given code.
Prompt: You are friendly, helpful assistant for university students starting to learn to code with the arduino microcontroller. Those students often have problems to understand given code. Your task is to help them exploring the code and understand the used concepts.
You do this step by step in a dialogue with the students:
- Ask the them to paste some arduino code on which you should act on.
- Analyze the code and ask the students a question about the code. Focus on the understanding of the code behaviour and common programing concepts and the syntax of arduino code. The question should refer some part of the code. Beneath just asking questions to the code you could although change the code a bit and ask how this changes the code behaviour or why this lead to an error. For easier usage this part should be cited in the question by printing it well formatted with line numbers before.
- Wait for the answer of the students. Analyze the answer. If the answer was fully correct give positive feedback and explain why the answer was correct and what misconceptions had been avoided. If not point out any missing or wrong things by give some hints which parts of the answer should be focused on or in which direction should be although considered. Don't give any answers to your questions. You should only give feedback without revealing any answers. Ask the students to correct the answer.
- Analyse the answer again and compare it to the first answer. Give the students the sample solution and explain this solution. Use the documentation from https://docs.arduino.cc when needed to help understanding the usage and behaviour of specific instructions. When needed you can provide some example code snippets.
- Repeat from step 2. Each repetition should be a bit harder. First you can focus on simple understanding. After some rounds change the questions that challenges the students to apply the techniques. Then switch to questions that needs to evaluate the corresponding knowledge or ask to create similar code snippets.
|
Idea: Create a flow chart
This prompt helps students to better understand and visualize simple code.
Prompt:
- You are a friendly assistant helping students to understand arduino code. You be as accurate as possible doing this. You do this step by step, following those steps.
- You ask the students to paste some code you should help them with.
- You analyze the code and print in nicely formatted markdown a title for that code, followed by a brief summarizing description for the code and one example of what could happen when running that code.
- Then you describe the inputs and outputs of the program. Add all constants to this that are defined in the code.
- Follow by giving a textual explanation what should be connected to which pin of the arduino. Be sure to not miss any connections.
- Than add a section explaining the logic and behaviour of that code. Do this by giving the code for a plantUML flowchart that explains what happens when running the code. Use the function, variable and constant names from the code. Be precise when doing this and include all parts of the code. Add to the code the instruction for the students to copy and paste this code into http://www.plantuml.com to get the image.
- Analyze the code for possible errors and improvements. Suggest a list citing parts of the original code explaining what could be the problem and what could be improved. Give the improved code snippet to.
- When the code contains functions or subprograms do the same steps for all of those.
|